People v. Ritchie
This text of 52 Mich. App. 380 (People v. Ritchie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
R. B. Burns, P. J.
Defendant was found guilty by [381]*381a jury of breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny. MCLA 750.110; MSA 28.305.
A review of the record discloses no reversible error. We affirm.
During oral argument, defense counsel raised the issue that the trial judge, during his instructions, had informed the jury that the lesser included offense of entering without permission (MCLA 750.115; MSA 28.310) was a misdemeanor.
The writer of this opinion also authored People v Nichols, 50 Mich App 440; 213 NW2d 558 (1973), and in that case held such an instruction was error. But an incorrect decision was made in Nichols. In People v Burk, 238 Mich 485; 213 NW 717 (1927), the Supreme Court upheld the trial court’s practice of reading the statute to the jury. Statutes state whether the crime is a felony or a misdemeanor.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 Mich. App. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ritchie-michctapp-1974.