People v. Riley

281 A.D.2d 992, 727 N.Y.S.2d 366, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2893
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted and the order entered and decision filed March 31, 1999 (259 AD2d 1030) are hereby vacated. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, specifically, whether defendant was denied his right to decide whether to testify at trial. Upon our review of the trial court proceedings, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order entered and decision filed March 31, 1999 are vacated and the Court will consider the appeal de novo (see, People v LeFrois, 151 AD2d 1046). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs on or before July 16, 2001. Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Riley, 281 A.D.2d 992, 727 N.Y.S.2d 366, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 992 (People v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Riley
292 A.D.2d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)