People v. Riley

253 A.D.2d 897, 678 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9844
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered February 24, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858, 859). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Riley, 253 A.D.2d 897, 678 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

253 A.D.2d 897 (People v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Riley
106 A.D.3d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)