People v. Riley
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered February 24, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858, 859). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
253 A.D.2d 897 (People v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.