People v. Richardson

96 A.D.3d 1699, 946 N.Y.S.2d 920
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Richardson. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 A.D.3d 1290

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Mark H. Fandrich, [1700]*1700A.J.), rendered April 27, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [6]), defendant’s sole challenge is to the severity of the sentence. Defendant’s unrestricted waiver of the right to appeal encompasses that challenge (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Richardson, 96 A.D.3d 1699, 946 N.Y.S.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

96 A.D.3d 1699 (People v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)