People v. Richardson

85 A.D.3d 660, 925 N.Y.S.2d 825
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Richardson. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 A.D.3d 934

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J., at suppression hearing and mistrial declaration; Richard D. Carruthers, J., at plea and sentencing), rendered March 11, 2009, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made valid written and oral waivers of his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]), which encompass his present claims (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831 [1999]; People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570 [1998]). As an alternative holding, we reject defendant’s suppression claim, and we find that his double jeopardy claim, which has been raised and rejected on the merits in a prior CPLR article 78 proceeding (Matter of Richardson v Wetzel, 47 AD3d 484 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 708 [2008]), is barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see People v Walker, 265 AD 2d 254, 254 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 908 [2000]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Richardson, 85 A.D.3d 660, 925 N.Y.S.2d 825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

85 A.D.3d 660 (People v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Muniz
696 N.E.2d 182 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Kemp
724 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
People v. Rivera
729 N.E.2d 339 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
Richardson v. Wetzel
47 A.D.3d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Walker
265 A.D.2d 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)