People v. Richardson

262 A.D.2d 427, 691 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6269
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 7, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the [428]*428defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered September 30, 1997, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim of an unreasonable delay in sentencing is not preserved for appellate review, because he never raised the issue at the time of his plea when the deferral in sentencing was discussed or at sentencing, and he never moved to vacate his plea on this ground (see, People v Marshall, 228 AD2d 15, 17-18; People v Thompson, 193 AD2d 841, 842). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Richardson, 262 A.D.2d 427, 691 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

262 A.D.2d 427 (People v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Branch
281 A.D.2d 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)