People v. Richardson
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County, rendered June 22, 1976, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and attempted criminal possession of a dangerous weapon as a felony, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631). Martuscello, J. P., Damiani, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
62 A.D.2d 1043 (People v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.