People v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Richardson

57 A.D.2d 965, 394 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12249

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Richardson. Read the opinion of the Court — 51 A.D.2d 462 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 1977·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the Addiction Research and Treatment Corporation from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 2, 1977, which, inter alia, denied its motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum served upon it at the instance of the respondent, the District Attorney of Kings County. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The District Attorney no longer seeks the information described in the subpoena duces tecum. Margett, J. P., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the Addiction Research and Treatment Corporation from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 2, 1977, which, inter alia, denied its motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum served upon it at the instance of the respondent, the District Attorney of Kings County. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The District Attorney no longer seeks the information described in the subpoena duces tecum. Margett, J. P., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

People v. Richardson, 57 A.D.2d 965, 394 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

57 A.D.2d 965 (People v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.