People v. Rice
This text of 197 A.D.2d 894 (People v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record shows that defendant’s waiver of appeal was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Derby, 168 AD2d 969, lv denied 77 NY2d 905). Defendant has raised no categories of appellate claims that survive his waiver (see, People v Callahan, supra, at 280; People v Pierson, 195 AD2d 1073; People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 A.D.2d 894, 604 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rice-nyappdiv-1993.