People v. Reynolds

278 A.D.2d 937, 718 N.Y.S.2d 693, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13425
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Reynolds. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 A.D.2d 735

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea allocution is factually insufficient (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839). The knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his contention that County Court erred in denying his suppression motion (see, People v Allen, 267 AD2d [938]*9381063, lv denied 94 NY2d 916), as well as his contention concerning the severity of the sentence (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). Defendant received effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J. — Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reynolds, 278 A.D.2d 937, 718 N.Y.S.2d 693, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 937 (People v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Toxey
655 N.E.2d 160 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Allen
267 A.D.2d 1063 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)