People v. Reynolds

276 A.D.2d 809, 717 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10926
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Reynolds. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 A.D.2d 735

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered December 18, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Rossey, 89 NY2d 970, 972; People v Norman, 85 NY2d 609, 627). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, without merit. O’Brien, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reynolds, 276 A.D.2d 809, 717 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 809 (People v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rossey
678 N.E.2d 473 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
People v. Norman
650 N.E.2d 1303 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)