People v. Reshard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Reshard

293 A.D.2d 290, 741 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3440

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 293 A.D.2d 290 (People v. Reshard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Reshard, 293 A.D.2d 290, 741 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered August 4, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in its denial of youthful offender treatment. In addition to the seriousness of [291]*291the crime, the court properly considered information contained in the Probation Department’s Supplemental Report indicating that defendant was terminated from a rehabilitation program approximately two months after starting it for failure to attend regularly, that defendant tested positive for marijuana and cocaine use, and that defendant does not appear amenable for probation supervision. Concur—Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered August 4, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in its denial of youthful offender treatment. In addition to the seriousness of [291]*291the crime, the court properly considered information contained in the Probation Department’s Supplemental Report indicating that defendant was terminated from a rehabilitation program approximately two months after starting it for failure to attend regularly, that defendant tested positive for marijuana and cocaine use, and that defendant does not appear amenable for probation supervision. Concur—Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 290, 741 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reshard-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack