People v. Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Reed

280 A.D.2d 263, 719 N.Y.S.2d 854, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 906

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 280 A.D.2d 263 (People v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Reed, 280 A.D.2d 263, 719 N.Y.S.2d 854, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Williams, J., at hearing; Gerald Sheindlin, J., at plea and sentence), rendered February 11, 1999, convicting defendant of two counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 12V2 to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. We note that this was a negotiated disposition in which defendant’s sentences ran concurrently with each other and with lengthy sentences imposed in three other counties. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Williams, J., at hearing; Gerald Sheindlin, J., at plea and sentence), rendered February 11, 1999, convicting defendant of two counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 12V2 to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. We note that this was a negotiated disposition in which defendant’s sentences ran concurrently with each other and with lengthy sentences imposed in three other counties. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 263, 719 N.Y.S.2d 854, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reed-nyappdiv-2001.