People v. Reed

254 A.D.2d 691, 678 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10336
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Reed. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 A.D.2d 866

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contentions concerning Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling are not preserved for our review (see, People v McAllister, 245 AD2d 184, lv denied 91 NY2d 894; People v Charlton, 239 AD2d 104, lv denied 90 NY2d 903; People v Venero, 211 AD2d 566, lv denied 86 NY2d 785), and we decline to exercise our power to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reed, 254 A.D.2d 691, 678 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 691 (People v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferlicca v. Starkweather
655 N.E.2d 700 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Venero
211 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Charlton
239 A.D.2d 104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. McAllister
245 A.D.2d 184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)