People v. Reddick
This text of 1 A.D.2d 385 (People v. Reddick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Collini, J.), rendered November 28, 2001, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in making its Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 [1974]; People v Mitchell, 298 AD2d 602 [2002]; People v Hegdal, 266 AD2d 472, 473 [1999]; People v Wilder, 253 AD2d 472 [1998]).
The defendant’s constitutional challenge to his adjudication as a persistent violent felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329, 335 [2001], cert denied 534 US 899 [2001]; People v Messer, 305 AD2d 260, 261 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 584 [2003]; People v Lebron, 293 AD2d 689, 690 [2002]; People v Rice, 285 AD2d 617 [2001]). Altman, J.E, Smith, Friedmann and Crane, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 385, 766 N.Y.S.2d 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reddick-nyappdiv-2003.