People v. Lebron
This text of 290 A.D.2d 565 (People v. Lebron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), rendered February 7, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention regarding the validity of his plea, as he did not move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see, People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858). In any event, his contention is without merit (see, People v Leo, 255 AD2d 458).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).
The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397; People v Leo, supra). Altman, J.P., Smith, Krausman, McGinity and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
290 A.D.2d 565, 736 N.Y.S.2d 618, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lebron-nyappdiv-2002.