People v. Reclamation District No. 108

147 P. 1176, 169 Cal. 786, 1915 Cal. LEXIS 572
California Supreme Court·Decided April 5, 1915·No. Sac. No. 2289.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

In this action quo warranto instituted by the people of the state of California upon the relation of appellants, the relatorsalone are attempting to appeal from a judgment for defendant given upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The notice of appeal states that they take the appeal "because they are parties in interest and because the attorney-general declines to take an appeal in the name of the state." Under our law such an action may be brought and maintained only by the attorney-general in the name of the people of the state, and the relators are not "parties" to the action. An attempt to appeal by them alone is necessarily ineffectual for any purpose.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. *Page 787

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reclamation District No. 108, 147 P. 1176, 169 Cal. 786, 1915 Cal. LEXIS 572 (Cal. 1915).

147 P. 1176 (People v. Reclamation District No. 108) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. Southwest Exploration Co. v. City of Huntington Beach
275 P.2d 601 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)
People ex rel. Cepeda Rodríguez v. Pagán
55 P.R. 873 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1940)
Pueblo ex rel. Cepeda Rodríguez v. Pagán
55 P.R. Dec. 906 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1940)
People ex rel. López v. Pérez Peña
54 P.R. 763 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1939)
Pueblo ex rel. López v. Pérez Peña
54 P.R. Dec. 804 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1939)
People Ex Rel. Cage v. Petroleum Rectifying Co.
68 P.2d 984 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
People v. Milk Producers Assn.
212 P. 957 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)