People v. Ravenell
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J), imposed January 26, 2012, upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, the resentence being a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed by the same court (Kreindler, J.), on January 4, 2001.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
*517 Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, his resentencing to a term that included the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law, since, at the time he was resentenced, he had not yet completed the sentence of imprisonment originally imposed upon him (see People v Brinson, 21 NY3d 490, 492-495 [2013]; People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630 [2011]; People v Rogers, 108 AD3d 683, 684 [2013]; People v Marhone, 107 AD3d 743, 743-744 [2013]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
120 A.D.3d 516 (People v. Ravenell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.