People v. Byron

124 A.D.3d 676, 997 N.Y.S.2d 906
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 2015·No. 2012-05696·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McGann, J.), imposed May 31, 2012, upon his conviction of rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being five years of postrelease supervision in addition to a determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed by the same court on March 12, 2001.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s resentencing to a term that included the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Ravenell, 120 AD3d 516, 517 [2014]; People v Nova, 116 AD3d 445, 445 [2014]). The defendant’s contention regarding his adjudication as a second violent felony offender was not properly before the court at the resentencing, which was limited to the imposition of the period of postrelease supervision (see People v Boyer, 22 NY3d 15, 24 [2013]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.

Balkin, J.E, Cohen, Duffy and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Byron, 124 A.D.3d 676, 997 N.Y.S.2d 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

124 A.D.3d 676 (People v. Byron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Ravenell
120 A.D.3d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Boyer
999 N.E.2d 1176 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
People v. Nova
116 A.D.3d 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)