People v. Rauf

109 A.D.3d 1009, 971 N.Y.S.2d 701
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rauf. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 A.D.3d 422

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), imposed July 19, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; cf. People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive. Eng, EJ., Dillon, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rauf, 109 A.D.3d 1009, 971 N.Y.S.2d 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

109 A.D.3d 1009 (People v. Rauf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)