People v. Rauf
This text of 109 A.D.3d 1009 (People v. Rauf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), imposed July 19, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; cf. People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive. Eng, EJ., Dillon, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 A.D.3d 1009, 971 N.Y.S.2d 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rauf-nyappdiv-2013.