People v. Ramos

229 A.D.2d 508, 646 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7746
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 206 A.D.2d 260

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered July 23, 1991, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Sullivan, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 229 A.D.2d 508, 646 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

229 A.D.2d 508 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)