People v. Ramos
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered April 14, 1993, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as a felony and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree.
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
[807]*807We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
205 A.D.2d 806 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.