People v. Ramos

187 A.D.2d 545, 590 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12746
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 A.D.2d 468

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered January 8, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 187 A.D.2d 545, 590 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

187 A.D.2d 545 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)