People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ramos

147 A.D.2d 719, 538 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2293

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 A.D.2d 719 (People v. Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ramos, 147 A.D.2d 719, 538 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2293 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered December 6, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the trial court improperly denied his motion for a severance is without merit (see, People v Velasquez, 147 AD2d 726 [decided herewith]). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We find no basis in the record to disturb the sentence imposed (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered December 6, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the trial court improperly denied his motion for a severance is without merit (see, People v Velasquez, 147 AD2d 726 [decided herewith]). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We find no basis in the record to disturb the sentence imposed (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A.D.2d 719, 538 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ramos-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack