People v. Bellamy
This text of 158 A.D.2d 526 (People v. Bellamy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[527]*527Most of the challenged comments made by the prosecutor during his summation were not objected to by defense counsel and therefore, the defendant’s claims of error have not been preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Dordal, 55 NY2d 954, rearg dismissed 61 NY2d 759). In any event, we find that the comments complained of did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396).
In light of the brutality displayed by the defendant, the sentence imposed was neither unduly harsh nor excessive (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Hooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.D.2d 526, 551 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bellamy-nyappdiv-1990.