People v. Ramos

224 A.D.2d 556, 638 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1121
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 203 A.D.2d 599

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Friedman, J.), rendered February 23, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not deprived of a fair trial as a result of being tried in absentia after he absconded in the midst of his trial (see, People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136; People v Roe, 196 AD2d 899; People v Floyd, 179 AD2d 770).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 224 A.D.2d 556, 638 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

224 A.D.2d 556 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Floyd
179 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Parker
440 N.E.2d 1313 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Roe
196 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)