People v. Ramos
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of having committed the infamous crime against nature. (Pen. Code, § 286.) He appeals from the judgment. Defendant did not testify or offer any evidence in his behalf.
The only point made is that there was no evidence of penetration. Any penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the crime. (Pen. Code, § 287.) Recitation of the nauseating details would serve no purpose. Suffice it to say that a police officer who witnessed the act testified to facts from which the trial judge could reasonably conclude that there had been penetration.
Affirmed.
Shinn, P. J., and Wood (Parker), J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
270 P.2d 540 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.