People v. Ramos

270 P.2d 540, 125 Cal. App. 2d 383, 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1894
California Court of Appeal·Decided May 20, 1954·No. Crim No. 5129·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

VALLÉE, J.

Defendant was convicted of having committed the infamous crime against nature. (Pen. Code, § 286.) He appeals from the judgment. Defendant did not testify or offer any evidence in his behalf.

The only point made is that there was no evidence of penetration. Any penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the crime. (Pen. Code, § 287.) Recitation of the nauseating details would serve no purpose. Suffice it to say that a police officer who witnessed the act testified to facts from which the trial judge could reasonably conclude that there had been penetration.

Affirmed.

Shinn, P. J., and Wood (Parker), J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 270 P.2d 540, 125 Cal. App. 2d 383, 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1894 (Cal. Ct. App. 1954).

270 P.2d 540 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martinez
188 Cal. App. 3d 19 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)
People v. Morgan
304 P.2d 138 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
People v. Ramos
125 Cal. App. 2d 383 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)