People v. Ramon

291 A.D.2d 511, 738 N.Y.S.2d 235, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1810
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 2002·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered April 15, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the trial court violated CPL 310.10 is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Johnson, 224 AD2d 635). In any event, under the circumstances there was no violation of the statutory mandate that the jurors be continuously kept together (see, People v Johnson, supra).

[512]*512The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, O’Brien and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramon, 291 A.D.2d 511, 738 N.Y.S.2d 235, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

291 A.D.2d 511 (People v. Ramon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kelly
946 N.E.2d 738 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Kelly
68 A.D.3d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Ramon
300 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)