People v. Ramirez

2022 NY Slip Op 05864
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramirez. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 N.Y.S.3d 725
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 2022·No. Ind. No. 997/19·Published

Opinion

People v Ramirez (2022 NY Slip Op 05864)
People v Ramirez
2022 NY Slip Op 05864
Decided on October 19, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 19, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
BARRY E. WARHIT, JJ.

2019-12662
(Ind. No. 997/19)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Dayshawn Ramirez, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Gamaliel Marrero of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jane Tully, J.), imposed September 25, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).

DUFFY, J.P., MILLER, DOWLING and WARHIT, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramirez, 2022 NY Slip Op 05864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

2022 NY Slip Op 05864 (People v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)