People v. Ramirez

2019 NY Slip Op 1330
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 21, 2019
Docket8483 1381/14
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1330 (People v. Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ramirez, 2019 NY Slip Op 1330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Ramirez (2019 NY Slip Op 01330)
People v Ramirez
2019 NY Slip Op 01330
Decided on February 21, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 21, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.

8483 1381/14

[*1]The People of the State of New York Respondent,

v

Yunnel Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.


David K. Bertan, Bronx, for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kristian D. Amundsen of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph J. Dawson, J.), rendered July 15, 2015, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees and resisting arrest, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Defendant's suspicious behavior, including moving a metal object from his waistband to the crotch area of his pants, gave the police a founded suspicion of criminality justifying a common-law inquiry, and "[a]s a result of defendant's flight upon the approach of the officers, and the additional suspicion engendered by it, the evidence met the level of reasonable suspicion, justifying pursuit" (People v Pines, 281 AD2d 311, 312 [1st Dept 2001], affd 99 NY2d 525 [2002]).

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-49 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations, including its evaluation of the plausibility of the police account of the incident.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 21, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Pines
782 N.E.2d 62 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ramirez-nyappdiv-2019.