People v. Ramirez

239 A.D.2d 523, 658 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5370
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramirez. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 A.D.2d 381

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.) rendered July 16, 1996, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the transcript of the sentencing proceedings indicates that the court’s determination regarding the defendant’s request for youthful offender status constituted a sound exercise of discretion (see, People v Madera, 167 AD2d 485).

[524]*524The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramirez, 239 A.D.2d 523, 658 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

239 A.D.2d 523 (People v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Madera
167 A.D.2d 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)