People v. Ramirez

226 A.D.2d 282, 641 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4518
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramirez. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 A.D.2d 381

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward Davidowitz, J.), rendered August 27, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

The prosecutor’s summation was well within the wide latitude permitted in responding to arguments raised by defense counsel’s closing statements (People v Nai Hing Liang, 208 AD2d 401). All of the inferences drawn by the prosecutor in summation were fairly drawn from the evidence (People v Haynes, 172 AD2d 242, lv denied 78 NY2d 967). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramirez, 226 A.D.2d 282, 641 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4518 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 282 (People v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Haynes
172 A.D.2d 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Nai Hing Liang
208 A.D.2d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)