People v. Ramirez

237 A.D.2d 120, 655 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2221
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramirez. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 A.D.2d 381

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Stackhouse, J.), rendered May 4, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.

Evidence of an uncharged drug transaction immediately preceding the instant sale was admissible as to the sale charge as well as the charge of possession with intent to sell (People v Pressley, 216 AD2d 202, lv denied 86 NY2d 800). Defendant’s claims of error with respect to the manner in which this evidence was introduced are unpreserved and without merit.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramirez, 237 A.D.2d 120, 655 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 120 (People v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pressley
216 A.D.2d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)