People v. Ramirez CA4/2
Opinion
Filed 10/12/23 P. v. Ramirez CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E081510
v. (Super.Ct.No. SWF1400855)
JOSEPH WILLIAM RAMIREZ, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. John D. Molloy, Judge.
Dismissed.
Patricia L. Brisbois, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
1 INTRODUCTION
Defendant Joseph William Ramirez appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition
for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6 (formerly § 1170.95).1 Counsel filed a
brief raising no arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216, 231
(Delgadillo).
On August 29, 2023, we notified defendant: (1) counsel filed a brief indicating no
arguable issues had been identified; (2) as a case arising from an order denying
postconviction relief, this court was not required to conduct an independent review of the
record, but we could do so in our discretion; (3) in accordance with the procedures set
forth in Delgadillo, he had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief raising any
argument he wanted this court to consider; and (4) if we did not receive a brief within
that 30-day period, we may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More than 30 days have
elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant.
We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed.
(Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
1 Penal Code section 1170.95 was renumbered as section 1172.6 without change in the text, effective June 30, 2022 (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10).
2 DISPOSITION
The appeal is dismissed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
FIELDS J. We concur:
McKINSTER Acting P.J.
RAPHAEL J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ramirez CA4/2 (People v. Ramirez CA4/2) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.