People v. Prince

141 A.D.3d 1103, 33 N.Y.S.3d 805
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Ronald D. Ploetz, J.), rendered July 7, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the third degree and criminal contempt in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

[1104]*1104Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [2]). We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because, based on County Court’s statements at the plea proceeding, “defendant may have erroneously believed that the right to appeal is automatically extinguished upon entry of a guilty plea” (People v Moyett, 7 NY3d 892, 893 [2006]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence of six months of incarceration and 10 years of probation is not unduly harsh or severe. We note that the period of probation was required by law to be 10 years because rape in the third degree is a felony sexual assault within the meaning of section 65.00 (3) of the Penal Law (see § 65.00 [3] [a] [iii]).

Present — Whalen, P.J., Peradotto, Lindley, DeJoseph and NeMoyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Prince, 141 A.D.3d 1103, 33 N.Y.S.3d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

141 A.D.3d 1103 (People v. Prince) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SADDLER, JR., JERRY T., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016