People v. Prince
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 124 (People v. Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), rendered May 27, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The chain of circumstances surrounding defendant’s use of a fraudulent gift card, which had been altered so that a third party would be *492 billed for the transaction, supported the inference that defendant knew it was forged (see e.g. People v Credel, 99 AD3d 541 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1060 [2013]; People v Price, 16 AD3d 323 [1st Dept 2005], Iv denied 5 NY3d 767 [2005]). In two transactions observed by plainclothes police officers, defendant engaged in a pattern of suspicious behavior evincing scienter and consciousness of guilt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 124, 146 A.D.3d 491, 44 N.Y.S.3d 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-prince-nyappdiv-2017.