People v. Powell

248 A.D.2d 646, 669 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2855
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Powell. Read the opinion of the Court — 246 A.D.2d 366

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marras, J.), rendered July 17, 1996, convicting him of assault in the second degree (three counts) and endangering the welfare of a child (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of the charges of which he was convicted are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d [647]*647245), or without merit (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620; CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Powell, 248 A.D.2d 646, 669 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 646 (People v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bynum
518 N.E.2d 4 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)