People v. Porter

California Court of Appeal

People v. Porter

72 Cal. App. 800

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Porter. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 Cal. App. 4 →

California Court of Appeal·Decided May 6, 1925·No. Crim. No. 1251·Published

Opinion

TYLER, P. J.

Appellant was accused, upon information by the district attorney of Marin County, with the crime of felony, to wit: escaping from state prison while undergoing a sentence of ten years’ imprisonment in the state prison at San Quentin under and by virtue of a judgment of the superior court of the county of Lassen.

He was tried and found guilty and this is an appeal from the judgment of conviction.

[801]*801The same points are urged as grounds for reversal that were considered in the case of People v. Conson, ante, p. 509 [237 Pac. 799].

Upon the authority of that case the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TYLER, P. J.

Appellant was accused, upon information by the district attorney of Marin County, with the crime of felony, to wit: escaping from state prison while undergoing a sentence of ten years’ imprisonment in the state prison at San Quentin under and by virtue of a judgment of the superior court of the county of Lassen.

He was tried and found guilty and this is an appeal from the judgment of conviction.

[801]*801The same points are urged as grounds for reversal that were considered in the case of People v. Conson, ante, p. 509 [237 Pac. 799].

Upon the authority of that case the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

People v. Porter, 72 Cal. App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

72 Cal. App. 800 (People v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related