People v. Pope
This text of 6 A.D.3d 1128 (People v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Frank P Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered January 8, 1999. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of sexual abuse in the first degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [3]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the inconsistencies in the testimony of the People’s witnesses do not render the verdict against the weight of the evidence (see People v Horne, 2 AD3d 1399 [2003]; People v Walker, 256 AD2d 1183, 1184 [1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 858 [1999]; People v Bell, 234 AD2d 915, 915-916 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 1009 [1997]; see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Moreover, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying without a hearing defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10. “Since the child’s recantation merely impeached or contradicted . . . her former testimony, it failed to constitute ‘newly discovered’ evidence within the meaning of CPL 440.10 (1) (g)” (People v Cassels, 260 AD2d 392, 393 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 1043 [1999]). Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 A.D.3d 1128, 775 N.Y.S.2d 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pope-nyappdiv-2004.