People v. Pinckney
99 A.D.3d 946, 951 N.Y.2d 912
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 17, 2012
StatusPublished
This text of 99 A.D.3d 946 (People v. Pinckney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Pinckney, 99 A.D.3d 946, 951 N.Y.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Rivera, J.P., Plorio, Dickerson, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Ford
657 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 946, 951 N.Y.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pinckney-nyappdiv-2012.