People v. Pinckney
99 A.D.3d 946, 951 N.Y.2d 912
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Pinckney. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 A.D.3d 1048 →
Opinion
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Rivera, J.P., Plorio, Dickerson, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Pinckney, 99 A.D.3d 946, 951 N.Y.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
99 A.D.3d 946 (People v. Pinckney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ford
657 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)