People v. Pinckney

67 A.D.3d 1030, 888 N.Y.S.2d 759
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 A.D.3d 1030 (People v. Pinckney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pinckney, 67 A.D.3d 1030, 888 N.Y.S.2d 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 14, 2006 (People v Pinckney, 27 AD3d 581 [2006]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 29, 2003.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pinckney v. Lee
E.D. New York, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 A.D.3d 1030, 888 N.Y.S.2d 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pinckney-nyappdiv-2009.