People v. Phillips

California Court of Appeal

People v. Phillips

38 Cal. App. 2d 412

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 11, 1940

DocketCrim. No. 530

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 Cal. App. 2d 412 (People v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Phillips, 38 Cal. App. 2d 412 (Cal. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

The defendant Lloyd Phillips was charged in two separate informations with the offense of burglary on two different occasions. The defendant has appealed from the judgment of conviction in each case. The clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts in these consolidated actions were filed in the office of the clerk of this court on February 13, 1940, and on February 27,1940, respectively, and the case was placed on the calendar for argument on April 9, 1940. No briefs have been filed and no appearance has been made for [413]*413him. The People moved to affirm the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code. It is quite apparent that the motion must be granted iñ each case. (People v. Whelan, 13 Cal. App. (2d) 274 [56 Pac. (2d) 960].)

Judgments affirmed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, J.

The defendant Lloyd Phillips was charged in two separate informations with the offense of burglary on two different occasions. The defendant has appealed from the judgment of conviction in each case. The clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts in these consolidated actions were filed in the office of the clerk of this court on February 13, 1940, and on February 27,1940, respectively, and the case was placed on the calendar for argument on April 9, 1940. No briefs have been filed and no appearance has been made for [413]*413him. The People moved to affirm the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code. It is quite apparent that the motion must be granted iñ each case. (People v. Whelan, 13 Cal. App. (2d) 274 [56 Pac. (2d) 960].)

Judgments affirmed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Cal. App. 2d 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-phillips-calctapp-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack