People v. Peters
This text of 257 N.E.2d 655 (People v. Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Walter Peters, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Julia P. Heit and Milton Adler for appellant.
Eugene Gold, District Attorney (Raoul Lerow of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.
Judgment affirmed. Corroboration of the complainant's testimony was not required since the assaults of which the defendant stands convicted were found to be completely independent of the earlier act of consummated rape charged by *776 the complainant. (See, e.g., People v. Moore, 23 N Y 2d 565; People v. Lennon, 22 N Y 2d 677.) No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 N.E.2d 655, 26 N.Y.2d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-peters-ny-1970.