People v. Persico

247 N.E.2d 667, 24 N.Y.2d 758
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 5, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

24 N.Y.2d 758 (1969)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Theodore Persico, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 17, 1969.
Decided March 5, 1969.

William Sonenshine for appellant.

Eugene Gold, District Attorney (Raymond J. Scanlan and Harry Brodbar of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered upon the ground that the court's failure to require the police officer to produce his memo book constituted reversible error (People v. Malinsky, 15 N Y 2d 86; People v. Rosario, 9 N Y 2d 286).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Persico, 247 N.E.2d 667, 24 N.Y.2d 758 (N.Y. 1969).

247 N.E.2d 667 (People v. Persico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Quinones
139 A.D.2d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Gilligan
349 N.E.2d 879 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)