People v. Perry

5 A.D.3d 237, 773 N.Y.S.2d 283, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2787
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perry. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 A.D.3d 619

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered May 22, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a con[238]*238trolled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s application pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79 [1986]). The record supports the court’s finding that the nondiscriminatory reason provided by the prosecutor for the challenge in question was not pretextual. This finding is entitled to great deference (see People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350 [1990], affd 500 US 352 [1991]), and we do not find any disparate treatment by the prosecutor of similarly situated panelists. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Sullivan, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perry, 5 A.D.3d 237, 773 N.Y.S.2d 283, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

5 A.D.3d 237 (People v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Hernandez v. New York
500 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1991)
People v. Hernandez
552 N.E.2d 621 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)