People v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Perry

283 A.D.2d 662, 723 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4350

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 662 (People v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Perry, 283 A.D.2d 662, 723 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4350 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judg[663]*663ment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered July 8, 1999, (1) convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree and violation of probation, and (2) which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted assault in the second degree and to violating the terms and conditions of his probation. Defendant’s probation was revoked and he was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of IV2 to 3 years. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief leads us to the same conclusion. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and received an appropriate sentence. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judg[663]*663ment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered July 8, 1999, (1) convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree and violation of probation, and (2) which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted assault in the second degree and to violating the terms and conditions of his probation. Defendant’s probation was revoked and he was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of IV2 to 3 years. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief leads us to the same conclusion. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and received an appropriate sentence. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 662, 723 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perry-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack