People v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Perry

191 A.D.2d 1041, 595 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3019

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 1041 (People v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Perry, 191 A.D.2d 1041, 595 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We have considered the arguments made by defendant in support of his contention that the sentence was harsh and excessive, including those made in [1042]*1042defendant’s supplemental pro se brief, and we conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We have considered the arguments made by defendant in support of his contention that the sentence was harsh and excessive, including those made in [1042]*1042defendant’s supplemental pro se brief, and we conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 1041, 595 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perry-nyappdiv-1993.