People v. Perry
191 A.D.2d 1041, 595 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3019
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perry. Read the opinion of the Court — 187 A.D.2d 678 →
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We have considered the arguments made by defendant in support of his contention that the sentence was harsh and excessive, including those made in [1042]*1042defendant’s supplemental pro se brief, and we conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Perry, 191 A.D.2d 1041, 595 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
191 A.D.2d 1041 (People v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.