People v. Perks
This text of 676 N.W.2d 625 (People v. Perks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dennis Michael PERKS, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2003 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, C.J., dissents and states as follows:
I respectfully dissent from the order denying leave to appeal. I adhere to the views expressed in my previous concurring statement in People v. Perks, 469 Mich. 864, 666 N.W.2d 267 (2003).
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
676 N.W.2d 625, 469 Mich. 1030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perks-mich-2004.